Saint Rajat Gupta

Rajat Gupta on the left

Rajat Gupta on the left

Rajat Gupta was born in a middle class Indian family and went on to make it to the millionaires list in the El Dorado called America.  He lost his parents when he was a teenager. But he was fortunate enough to get support for studying at the IIT, Delhi and later at the Harvard Business School.  He went on to become the managing director of McKinsey & Co in 1994.  He was capable and ability is always appreciated and promoted in the private sector – at least in a country like America.  (In India, ability is usually kicked down so that political manipulators can rise in the hierarchy of power.  Or the ability will be manipulated for the same purpose, thereby killing the creativity of the individual possessing the ability!)

Rajat Gupta could not only raise his company to great heights but also earn a great reputation for the company in philanthropic work. 

Philanthropy can be a mask, especially in the world of capitalism.  All your deception can be concealed behind a few well-advertised acts of charity.  Mr Gupta cultivated the image of “a sage and a saint” in the management world.  [The quoted phrase is taken from C P Chandrasekhar’s column in the latest issue of the Frontline.]

It didn’t take much time for the mask to be unravelled.  Today, Mr Gupta stands convicted of malpractices. 

Why would Mr Gupta who had so much wealth and success to boast of indulge in malpractices?  Is it mere greed for more wealth?  Or is it a desire for power?  Chandrasekhar’s article says that Mr Gupta was “one of India’s non-resident icons… He walked with ease in and out of India’s corridors of power and its corporate circles….”

Probably that power went to his head.  Power is a highly intoxicating thing.  It intoxicates far more addictively than alcohol or drugs.  While alcohol and drugs have a limit (the extreme being one’s own end), power has no limits.  Power can aspire to the realms of the divine.  Power can make you a god on the earth.  [Look at the semi-literate MLA of your constituency or the neighbouring one to understand this better.]

I have seen people giving up everything except wealth to rise in power.  They give up all values and principles, and even relationships.  They do not even realise that they are making fools of themselves in front of other people when they preach what is diametrically opposed to what they do in their quest for power.  People are not fools though they may be mediocre and may even fail to secure an average score on an IQ test!

Saints are people who want power.  In fact they want the highest form of power.  They want to control people with infinite and divine power.  Was Rajat Gupta aspiring for that kind of power?

What would he have gained with that kind of power? 

Why did he defeat himself with the kind of deception he practised while he was actually successful in his profession and could have risen higher and higher in that profession?

Would Shakespeare have written a play with Mr Gupta as the protagonist were he (Shakespeare) alive today? Shakespeare’s tragic heroes are people who had immense ability but also had a “flaw” (renowned Shakespearean critic, A C Bradley’s term) in character. 

Ability is not enough.  One should know oneself.  That’s very ancient wisdom. 

In India, however, one can get on without knowing oneself.  One can be an utter fake and win till the end.  That’s a very interesting lesson I have learnt.  That’s why I call Rajat Gupta a saint.  He would have been one were he doing his job in India.

Advertisements

About matheikal

My more regular blog can be accessed at www.matheikal.blogspot.com
This entry was posted in Current Affairs, Economy and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

13 Responses to Saint Rajat Gupta

  1. Raghuram Ekambaram says:

    What you say is true, but what you have given may not be the whole truth. Of course, you did not mention that Rajat Gupta is not a one-off. The skeletons are dropping out of the closet, be it in the US, UK, France …

    But, in my opinion, there are many “saints” (of the type you mention; wanting ever more power and some in ochre colored clothes, some wearing Gandhi caps and so on) who are stuck even in the middle rungs of the ladder. You do need not be a Mukesh Ambani or Ratan Tata to be such a “saint”!
    A “saint” is a saint only till he is caught. If caught, he/she becomes a “saint”!
    RE

  2. Griot says:

    Here you are, Matheikal! Four years ago you commented on a blog piece of mine (in Sulekha). I just saw it! So of course I had to track you down and thank you. The piece was ‘Writing the River’ by poetbleu. I’ll be back to read your blogs.

    • matheikal says:

      Would you mind giving me the link to my comment to your poem? Or anywhere I posted a comment to your post?

      Sulekha was a terrible place. A fiefdom of the Sangh Parivar! Has it changed?

      • Griot says:

        I did not know about their Sangh Parivar connection. My posts are read, but no one responds. I think I’ll get out of there. Here’s the link to your commen (I wrote that piece when I was jetlagged in Pune, on one of my trips from the US to open a software company in Pune, around 17 years ago. Who knew outsourcing would grow into the monster it is today? Back then it took a whole day to send an email out of Pune.) http://poetbleu.sulekha.com/blog/post/2008/04/writing-the-river/comments.htm

      • matheikal says:

        Yeah, I visited the link and I understand… I would suggest you get out of Sulekha. It’s better to make your own little space than stay linked to one which is ruled over by ancient landlords.

  3. Sir the other side of the story is:
    http://shekharkapur.com/blog/2012/06/in-defence-of-rajat-gupta/

    Of course, I understand that Rajat Gupta is just an example.

  4. How much I wanted him to be proved innocent, as he was an icon. One of the biggest thing a person can lose is his/her reputation. I feel sad that someone can have such a massive fall.

    I guess we have to stop searching for heroes and try to look internally.

    • matheikal says:

      Yes, we have only ourselves to us.

    • matheikal says:

      Yes, Sabyasachi, we have to look inward. Have to. That’s the need of the hour. The technology is driving us outward. Just today I saw a boy wearing a tee-shirt with the inscription “I was born intelligent: Facebook destroyed me”. How much has technology contributed to civilisation?

  5. KayEm says:

    I read Shekhar Gupta’s article too. I’ve read Shekhar for years and his opinions aren’t lightly given. That is why I feel there is something here that we simply don’t know. Let’s wait for the outcome of Rajat’s appeal. As for some people believing they can do anything as long as they aren’t found out, that, unfortunately, is also true.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s