Dignity and the profession of teaching


Living with dignity is a fundamental need for all normal human beings.  The human being is simultaneously a creator and a product of his/her environment.  The Biblical notion that “the imagination of man is evil from his youth” (Genesis 8:21) strips all dignity from human existence.  It thus became an imperative for the Christian God to become man and nail his dignity on a cross in order to redeem that dignity.  Consequently also it became an imperative for all Christians to surrender his essentially evil self to the commandments of God and his priests. 

The Reformation and Renaissance movements sought to redeem human dignity from such a pessimistic view by viewing man as essentially good.  Rousseau, for example, argued that man was essentially good and that it was his environment that corrupted him.  Such views transferred the blame for evil from human nature to the external environment. 

Perhaps, both these views are flawed.  Perhaps, the empiricist and objective standpoint that man is essentially neither good nor evil is more correct.  According to this view, man is capable of developing in either direction.  A favourable environment is likely to create a good human being, while an unfavourable one tends to nurture the seeds of evil. 

The purpose of education is to enable the student to deal effectively with his/her environment.  No environment is totally good or evil.  Education should enable a student to deal with the evils in his environment in such a way that its impact on him/her will not sap the potential goodness in him.  Rather, putting it more positively, education should enable the student to rise above the evil and even change the evil into good. 

That’s why the role of the teacher is of immense importance in the world.  It is the teachers who create the environment of the students and also guide the students to deal with the environment outside the school. 

But what if the teachers are not given their due share of dignity?  There are too many private schools today in the country that impose more and more duties and responsibilities on the teachers while at the same time withdraw their permissible allowances and other benefits.  Teaching has been degraded into an undesirable profession by such schools.  Can such a system expect any capable persons to join the profession of teaching?  Can teachers who choose the profession out of necessity rather than personal choice do justice to the job? 

The impact of privatisation and the greed that accompanies the capitalist system is certainly not limited to the profession of teaching.  However, since the Teacher’s Day is round the corner, I chose to muse on this ancient (oldest?) profession.


About matheikal

My more regular blog can be accessed at www.matheikal.blogspot.com
This entry was posted in Education and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Dignity and the profession of teaching

  1. Raghuram says:


    Two things, not necessarily extraneous to this post but perhaps relevant only peripherally. One, this is one of the bestest posts from you (that is not literary in nature – means, I could relate to it). Two, it does not belong in your earlier space.

    Now, about what you have taken from Genesis 8:21. Can this be the source of the concept of Original Sin? I do not think so, because Baptism happens before “youthhood” is reached, does it not? Man is born sinful. then, why wait till “youthhood” to confer the status of evil on him? It would have been more appropriate to confet the title of EVIL on HIM! I am confused. I am not being frivolous here, please understand. I really am confused.

    Raghuram Ekambaram

    • matheikal says:

      Raghuram, I wrote it as an exercise in sublimation. Certain developments at my workplace drove me to it. When I finished writing it, it didn’t excite me at all as some other posts of mine did especially those which I wrote in times of frustration. It’s interesting that you and another reader (Benny) found it good.

      You are right, this doesn’t belong in my earlier space. I hope I won’t have to write this kind of articles again and again before the concerned persons understand what I’m trying to tell them.

      The concept of Original Sin originated with the Fall [the capital F is not mine, really] of Eve and Adam. I put Eve first because she fell first, according to the Bible. Ted Hughes, the former Poet Laureate, put it differently:
      Adam ate the apple.
      Eve ate Adam.
      The serpent ate Eve.
      Thisis the dark intestine – tha’t what Hughes said in a poem. Humanity was born in the dark intestine of the serpent – that’s the Original Sin!

  2. benny says:

    I wish to make a print out of this and hang it in the staff room. But I am discouraged by the first para of it.. However, let me thank you for the plain speak of it. May be in another 20 years the teaching profession may become reduced to just management of the school system. Why lament now? Do you really think that students pick up your thoughts and fill their selves with knowledge? Teahers are a redundent lot.Better look up for smething else.

  3. sir,I totally agree with your thoughts about dignity.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s