Cowards and Pseudonyms


Acclaimed psychologist, Erik Erikson, argued that identity versus role confusion is the central crisis in adolescence.  “Who am I?”  “What do I believe in?”  These are two of the most important questions that an adolescent has to tackle.  It is Erikson who coined the phrase ‘identity crisis.’  Erikson believed that if an adolescent resolved his identity crisis successfully he/she will achieve a stable sense of identity which can eventually lead to the necessary intimacy in early adulthood relationships.  Otherwise the adolescent will stumble over his identity, relationships and values. 

A 'pseudonymous' attacker during the Shiv Sena riots against people from Bihar

The criminal who shot (and who can shoot accurately, according to newspaper reports) Jyotirmoy Dey is named “Rohee Thangappan Joseph alias Satish Kalya.”  Thangappan Joseph is probably his original name because that is a very common name in Kerala.  But Rohee is not at all a Keralite name.  Satish Kalya is very un-Keralaite too.  So what is that criminal’s geographical identity?  Where can we locate (place) him?

I raise this question not for the sake of locating that particular criminal in any particular geographical area, but for focusing on the question of identity and pseudonyms. 

Pseudonymous writers never fascinate me.  They irritate me endlessly.  They appear to be cowards who attack lying in ambush.  They are like criminals who have no specific identity known to the public.  Often they make remarks and comments that are meant to attack someone personally or to defend a particular ideology or political party or religion or organisation… Like the “quotation gangs” in Kerala who attack anyone on payment of a fee.  One reason why I migrated from my previous blog service provider is the preponderance of pseudonymous writers there.  Many of those pseudonymous bloggers seem to be part of a network.  The network will be activated the moment you post an article or a comment that is not acceptable to any one member in the network, much like a gang of adolescents rising up in rebellion over some trifle matter that affects any gang member. 

One advantage at WordPress is that pseudonymous commenting is not very easy.  WordPress reveals the identity of the writer as much as it possibly can.  For example, WordPress will let me know exactly the email identity, its location, the service provider and the IP identity of the commentator if I want.  I have succeeded in keeping away quite a few criminals from my blog – not by blocking their comments but by sending them replies as private email messages.

Such transparency is required at all levels of human social transactions.  Crimes can be controlled to quite an extent.

I am not totally against pseudonyms.  There are people who write blogs on purely personal matters.  In such cases anonymity is a necessity.  Such writing is meant for personal catharsis and bear no social significance.  Pseudonym or real name – it makes no difference to the society in such cases.  But when somebody writes on issues related to social affairs and is keen on attacking others who disagree with him/her should reveal his/her identity.  Otherwise the person is a coward and a potential criminal. Technology must interfere with the inception of transparency.


About matheikal

My more regular blog can be accessed at
This entry was posted in Life and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Cowards and Pseudonyms

  1. dawnanddew says:

    Sometime back my husband created an account with orkut wtih anonymous name Valayapati. Using that account I entered the polls and replied to only one blog where some hooligans (so called students) considered my classes boring. I replied in my poor Hindi that they hardly bother about studies. One student called me ‘sale’. Nice. I didn’t reply. Then one of the ex students one Prakash (singer of nanak house) identified me. and stated ‘It must be she herself. lol”. By lol he meant laugh out loudly (courtesy: internet – google engine) I found another meaning of lol, that is lots of love. I could not help thinking of sending a reply revealing my identity and thanking him for making me reconsider my way of teaching, adding the expression lol with the other meaning “lots of love”. Because I don’t think I did any harm to Prakash. IT was his own misgivings and misunderstandings ‘guided’ by his ‘favourite’ mentor that the boy was acting that way. I really don’t have any problem revealing identity. So I agree with you 100 percent.
    ps: This boy left in class x. I taught him only one year in class 8. He used to score above 90 then. He was a great admirer of my classes at that time. lol to Prakash:) here. Here I mean to laugh out loud ironically. How children easily remain thankless!

    • matheikal says:

      What I do is to avoid the social networks altogether just as I would avoid the society itself given a choice. Social networks, my experience says, are places where juvenile delinquents have all kinds of fun and nothing more. If at all you want to enter such a place where angels would dread to tread, it’s highly advisable to enter with a pseudonym and keep the pseudonym safe.

  2. That’s an all round amazingly written piece.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s