To Arrest a Romantic Dream


After much political dithering and slithering, people in Power have decided to slap an FIR on Arundhati Roy for her alleged anti-India remark vis-à-vis Kashmir.  Roy has answered it with an article titled “They can file a charge posthumously against Jawaharlal Nehru too” in The Hindu [Nov 28].  The article is a collection of quotes from Nehru’s writings and speeches which show how Roy’s view is very much similar to Nehru’s.  Of course, Nehru was also a “pseudo-secularist” in the vocabulary of those who protest vehemently against Roy.  Will they now wave the flag of anti-nationalism against Nehru?

Writing “an old fashioned essay” on Arundhati Roy in Governance Now [Nov 16-30], Shiv Visvanathan, social scientist, argues that Roy is “bit of a social Rorschach.  People project on her their fears and longings.”  True as that may be, I think Roy is much more than that.  She is the Shelley of the Ode to the West Wind sans the despair and melancholy.  She is the romantic rebel with a powerful vision. 

Who but a romantic visionary can speak these words?  “At a time when opportunism is everything, when hope seems lost, when everything boils down to a cynical business deal, we must find the courage to dream.  To reclaim romance.  The romance of believing in justice, in freedom, and in dignity.” The quote is from Roy’s I. G. Khan Memorial Lecture delivered at Aligarh Muslim University in 2004.  The lecture is one of the chapters of her latest book, Listening to Grasshoppers.  Interestingly, the book is dedicated “to those who have learned to divorce hope from reason.” 

The irrational optimism of the romantic is what fires Roy’s soul.  [A coincidence that I’m compelled to mention: I used the phrase ‘irrational optimism’ to describe my own optimism in answer to a commentator’s question in an earlier blog of mine.  Roy’s book with its dedication staring at me reached me by the next day’s courier.]

The irrational romantic with a fire in the soul that scorches too many people with quite a few vested interests is indeed playing with fire.  These people with vested interests, the people in Power, will find a way of shutting out the blazing vision in the darkest dungeon.  Roy has antagonised both politicians and corporate bigwigs.  Does she need any more enemies?  She has them anyway.  Every ‘nationalist’ Indian clamours for her blood.

The latest charge against her is that she was advocating secessionism in Kashmir.  Ironically, Roy believes that India is labouring under a New Secessionism which is engendered by a relatively small section of people who appropriate everything to themselves: “land, rivers, water, freedom, security, dignity, fundamental rights…” [From the same lecture mentioned above]

What Arundhati Roy aspires to do is bring back all those things to the people of India.  To everyone, rather than the few. 

She is like the prophets of old, speaking inconvenient truths too loud and clear.  And like the prophets’, too, her voice will remain a cry in the wilderness, the political wilderness of India vitiated by power-hungry, wealth-hungry leaders and their equally hungry followers as well as the corporate bigwigs.  Such a hunger does not understand visionary dreams.  Rather, it does not want to understand. 

Roy’s dream may never materialise.  But the dream is admirable.  With her dream, Roy stands out as an oddity in today’s India which would rather revolve round Pamela Anderson and Rakhi Sawant.  Will India shut out that odd, blazing dream behind the ominous curtain of POTA or some such Act?

My earlier posts on Arundhati Roy:

Kashmir, Arundhati Roy and Violence

Writers should be die-able


About matheikal

My more regular blog can be accessed at
This entry was posted in india and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to To Arrest a Romantic Dream

  1. aram says:

    I remember u talking abt Ms. Roy and Mr. Arun Poorie in our english class long back…. Since then i hv read many of their pieces but seem to hv developed a hatred of sorts towards them…. Sorry if i sound foolish!!

    • Matheikal says:

      No, Aram, you don’t sound foolish at all. You have just been frank. But I’d like you to probe yourself a little further and tell me why you find Roy evoking hatred in you. I’m asking this out of an eagerness that’s more than curiosity.

      Regarding Arun Poorie, I don’t remember projecting him as a thinker of any sort at any time. I was an avid reader of India Today in those days, but not now.

  2. dawnanddew says:

    ‘…her voice will remain a cry in the wilderness…’ and then it will evolve and materialise. I do have such romantic dreams. I dared to dream when I was in the land of no hope. If my pint sized dream has come true, why not Roy’s noble one? Let us keep dreaming with her. Who can stop us? Thanks for the excellent words!

    • Matheikal says:

      Dawn, that’s great. To have dreams and hopes.
      But Roy’s dream is almost utopian, especially in the given circumstances. Yet I think she is necessary, her dream is necessary… Otherwise life would be so boring with only the hungry people around!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s